比例这个东西，是根据摆放和把玩时候的方便来决定的。一般我觉得长度和宽度以30厘米左右为上限，再大了拿在手上就像挥大刀，而且过大的金属模型也过于沉重，一不小心失了手，可就香消玉殒了。而过小也不合 适，模型太小，细节完全不能做出，这样就是儿童玩具，不是模型了。

The proportion is determined by the convenience of placing and playing. Generally, I think the maximum length and width is about 30 cm. No matter how big it is, holding it in my hand is like waving a dagger. Moreover, the oversized metal model is too heavy. If I miss it, it will die. And too small is not appropriate, the model is too small, the details can not be made, so it is a children's toy, not a model.

而现在的主力战机模型，以1:72为一个合适的比例，这样F-XX系列和Su-27兄弟都能在30厘米左右。目前1:72主流飞机模型里面。

Now the main fighter model, with a ratio of 1:72, can be about 30 cm for both the F-XX series and the Su-27 brothers. Currently, 1:72 is in the mainstream aircraft model.

1:48：直升机模型一般以1:48为宜（现在市面上的美军直升机模型、共军直升机模型：武直9、武直10都是这个比例，俄军例外，成品里面只能买到塑料的1:72的米-24/28和卡-52）也有少数固定翼战斗机采用这个比例，这样产品细节容易做，但是显得太夯，缺点也容易被放大。

1: 48: the helicopter model is generally 1:48 (currently, the U.S. helicopter model and the Communist helicopter model on the market are all at this ratio, except for the Russian army, which can only buy the plastic 1:72 m-24 / 28 and Ka-52 in the finished products). This ratio is also adopted by a few fixed wing fighters, which makes the details of the product easy to do, but it is too tamping, and the shortcomings are easy to be ignored Big.

1:72：主流战斗机模型比例，书桌摆台刚好合适。

1: 72: the proportion of mainstream fighter model is just right.

1:144：主要做轰炸机模型、运输机模型、预警机模型等（比如Corgi的B-52、E-3）这个我认为是收集大型飞机的佳比例。可以保留一点细节，又不于过大或者过小。

1: 144: we mainly do bomber model, transport model, early warning model, etc. (such as Corgi's B-52, E-3). I think this is the best proportion to collect large aircraft. You can keep a little detail, but not too big or too small.

1:200：这个比例传统上是客机模型。但是近有些厂家，把市面上卖得好的主流战斗机从1:72缩小到这个比例，同样涂装，我没买过，但是好像出货越来越汹涌。

1: 200: this scale is traditionally a model airliner. But recently, some manufacturers have reduced the proportion of mainstream fighters that sell well in the market from 1:72 to this ratio. I haven't bought the same coating, but it seems that the shipment is more and more turbulent.

再小的比例，就缺失太多细节，没意思了。尽管不同厂家，如果同样比例的开云网页登录 ，在一起一点也不突兀。这有点工业标准化的意思。

No matter how small the proportion is, there are too many details missing. It's boring. Although different manufacturers, if the same proportion of military models, together is not abrupt. It's a bit of industrial standardization.